The Life and Times of Kate
Chopin
An American
Literature Lesson Plan for 10th Grade
![]() |
Title
of text: ÒBiography of Kate
ChopinÓ
Author:
Dr. Neal Wyatt
URL: http://www.vcu.edu/engweb/eng384/katebio.htm
Publisher: Virginia Commonwealth University
Last
Update: 1995
For
this Reading-Learning plan American Literature students studying 19th century authors will read a biography on the life of author
Kate Chopin. Dr. Neal Wyatt
(graduate of VCU) wrote this biography as part of his WebQuest, ÒExploring
ChopinÕs The Awakening.Ó His sources
included published Kate Chopin biographies by Emily Toth, Per Seyersted, and
Mary Papke.
For this assignment, the students will not
need to read the chronology printed at the end of Wyatt's article
unless the teacher believes otherwise.
The
best time to use this assignment would be while studying ChopinÕs novella, The Awakening, or any of her other
works. ChopinÕs work can be very
difficult for 10th grade students to read because most of them find
it tedious or Òboring.Ó By
studying the author, the students will develop more background knowledge,
therefore forming a deeper relationship with the text.
Students
should be encouraged to explore how ChopinÕs life may have affected her
writing, and how different the studentsÕ lives would be if they lived during
the same time period as Chopin.
They should be encouraged to ask questions such as, ÒWhat would I do in
ChopinÕs position?Ó
Learning Objectives:
Alabama State Standards Met:
1.) Apply both literal and inferential
comprehension strategies, including drawing conclusions and making inferences
about characters, motives, intentions, and attitudes in short stories, drama,
poetry, novels, and essays and other nonfiction texts.
3.) Read with literal and inferential
comprehension a variety of informational and functional reading materials,
including making inferences about effects when passage provides cause;
inferring cause when passage provides effect; making inferences, decisions,
and predictions from tables, charts, and other text features; and identifying
the outcome or product of a set of directions.
16.) Explain the purpose and benefits of using
predicting, summarizing, underlining, outlining, note taking, and reviewing as
part of personal study skills.
Readability level:
Flesch Reading Ease |
56.5 |
Flesch-Kincaid
Readability Grade |
10.3 |
I
believe that the readability grade for 10.3 is fairly misleading, and is most
likely due to the names of the authors cited in the text, which are long and
difficult to read.
The
only difficult vocabulary word within the text is Òkunstleroman,Ó which is
defined in the text as, Òa tale of a young woman who struggles to realize
herselfÑand her artistic ability.Ó
If
the students find any other words in the text that they are not familiar with,
they should write them down in their notes or in their vocabulary journals.
This expository, journalistic text is appropriate for a 10th grade American Literature
class because it fulfills the standards listed above, and it is only .3 above
the standard reading level for this grade. Also, the reading activity will be done using several easy steps
based on the proven step-by-step methods of teaching
comprehension.
However,
as in most reading assignments, special attention should be given to
any struggling readers in the class. For example, when
dividing the groups, the teacher might choose to place the struggling
readers with a few advanced students who might be positive
influences. As long as the students understand the reading
assignment, they should find this activity to be easy and fun.
Activities:
Pre-Reading:
During Reading:
Post-Reading:
Grading Rubric:
The
following rubric can be used to grade the studentsÕ work. The guidelines on the rubric have been
assigned numerical value points, but it is possible for a studentÕs work to be
between two of the areas of performance.
Do not be afraid to award half points. Be as strict or as lenient as you see fit.
(Note: Much of this rubric is based on class
participation. If you have a student
who is absent from the class or is unable to participate, you might want to
consider making a different rubric or giving an alternate assignment.)
|
Unsatisfactory 1 |
Descent 2 |
Good 3 |
Excellent 4 |
Score |
Participation |
Gave no input or feedback during group discussion and did
not take notes. |
Gave no input, but took notes for the group. |
Gave good input and feedback to group members. Was willing to take whatever jobs
assigned to him/her. Worked
well with others. |
Led much of the group discussion. Took an obvious interest in the text. Showed initiative and great work ethic.
|
|
During reading exercise notes.
|
Took no notes on the text. Did not highlight or underline. Showed little evidence of reading the text. Did not attempt to use the reading strategies recommended. Instead relied on other group members.
|
Underlined
a few things, but did not write any notes any notes. Relied
mostly on the notes of other group members instead of coming up with
their own ideas. |
Underlined and noted several interesting facts. Showed signs of appropriately using
reading comprehension strategies.
Showed attempt to comprehend. |
Underlined several interesting pieces and wrote thoughtful
notes. Obviously re-read notes
to expound on thinking. |
|
After reading exercise notes
(Evaluates fufillment of standards #1 and #3)
|
Answered none of the questions, and did not identify
positive predictions or comment on new knowledge. |
Answered only a few of the questions. |
Answered all of the questions and adequately compiled
newfound knowledge with the list of prior knowledge. |
Gave detailed answers to all of the questions and compiled
newfound and prior knowledge neatly and adequately. |
|
Group presentation (Evaluates long-term comprehension and application of knowledge.) |
Did not participate. Did not speak in presentation or help group to prepare for
the presentation. |
Only spoke during the presentation, and provided no
valuable insight. Tried to
steal the show and was disrespectful to other members. |
Actively participated in both the preparation of the
presentation and the presentation itself. Gave valuable insight. |
Actively participated in both the preparation of the presentation and the presentation itself. Made sure everyone gave valuable insight.
|
|
Total: |
|
|
|
|
/16 |