Ideological orientation based on PERSFREE and ECONFREE
indexes
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
LIBERTARIAN 1.00 109 26.7 28.0 28.0
CONSERVATIVE 2.00 110 27.0 28.3 56.3
LIBERAL 3.00 44 10.8 11.3 67.6
POPULIST 4.00 51 12.5 13.1 80.7
DIVIDED 5.00 74 18.1 19.0 99.7
APATHETIC 6.00 1 .2 .3 100.0
. 19 4.7 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 389 Missing cases 19
Calculation of ECONFREE and PERSFREE indexes:
ECONFREE = (E1 + E2 + E3 + E4 + E5 + E6 + E7 + E8 + E9 + E10 + E11 + E13
+ E14 + E15 + E19 + E20 + E21 + E22 + E23 + 8 - E24) / 20
PERSFREE = (80 - P1 - P2 - P3 - P4 - P5 - P6 - P7 - P8 - P9 - P10 + P11 + P12
+ P13 + P14 + P15 + P16 + P18 + P19 + P20 + P21) / 20
COUNT NOPINION = E1 TO E11 E13 TO E15 E19 to E20 E24 E21 to E23
P1 to P16 P18 to P20 (4 0 SYSMIS).
IF (ECONFREE GT 4 AND PERSFREE GT 4) IDEOTYPE = 1 (LIBERTARIAN).
IF (ECONFREE GT 4 AND PERSFREE LE 4) IDEOTYPE = 2 (CONSERVATIVE).
IF (ECONFREE LE 4 AND PERSFREE GT 4) IDEOTYPE = 3 (LIBERAL).
IF (ECONFREE LE 4 AND PERSFREE LE 4) IDEOTYPE = 4 (POPULIST).
IF (ECONFREE GE 3.5 AND ECONFREE LT 4.5
AND PERSFREE GE 3.5 AND PERSFREE LT 4.5) IDEOTYPE = 5 (DIVIDED).
IF (NOPINION GT 20) IDEOTYPE = 6 (APATHETIC).
Govt ensure jobs, price stability (E1)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 13 3.2 3.2 3.2
AGREE 2.0 50 12.3 12.4 15.6
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 93 22.8 23.0 38.6
NO OPINION 4.0 33 8.1 8.2 46.8
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 111 27.2 27.5 74.3
DISAGREE 6.0 70 17.2 17.3 91.6
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 34 8.3 8.4 100.0
.0 4 1.0 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 404 Missing cases 4
Six month notice to lay off (E2)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 40 9.8 9.9 9.9
AGREE 2.0 125 30.6 30.8 40.6
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 108 26.5 26.6 67.2
NO OPINION 4.0 40 9.8 9.9 77.1
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 49 12.0 12.1 89.2
DISAGREE 6.0 31 7.6 7.6 96.8
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 13 3.2 3.2 100.0
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
More economic regulation (E3)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 38 9.3 9.4 9.4
AGREE 2.0 105 25.7 25.9 35.2
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 68 16.7 16.7 52.0
NO OPINION 4.0 48 11.8 11.8 63.8
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 72 17.6 17.7 81.5
DISAGREE 6.0 52 12.7 12.8 94.3
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 23 5.6 5.7 100.0
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Govt ensure decent life (E4)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 8 2.0 2.0 2.0
AGREE 2.0 25 6.1 6.2 8.1
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 49 12.0 12.1 20.2
NO OPINION 4.0 23 5.6 5.7 25.9
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 99 24.3 24.4 50.2
DISAGREE 6.0 107 26.2 26.4 76.6
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 95 23.3 23.4 100.0
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Ensure good farm prices (E5)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 29 7.1 7.1 7.1
AGREE 2.0 112 27.5 27.6 34.7
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 144 35.3 35.5 70.2
NO OPINION 4.0 51 12.5 12.6 82.8
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 43 10.5 10.6 93.3
DISAGREE 6.0 19 4.7 4.7 98.0
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 8 2.0 2.0 100.0
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Gradual nationalization of industry (E6)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 3 .7 .7 .7
AGREE 2.0 11 2.7 2.7 3.5
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 14 3.4 3.5 6.9
NO OPINION 4.0 73 17.9 18.0 24.9
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 100 24.5 24.7 49.6
DISAGREE 6.0 104 25.5 25.7 75.3
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 100 24.5 24.7 100.0
.0 3 .7 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 405 Missing cases 3
Tax for universal health care (E7)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 14 3.4 3.4 3.4
AGREE 2.0 71 17.4 17.4 20.9
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 86 21.1 21.1 42.0
NO OPINION 4.0 41 10.0 10.1 52.1
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 88 21.6 21.6 73.7
DISAGREE 6.0 71 17.4 17.4 91.2
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 36 8.8 8.8 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Subsidize business for local jobs (E8)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 14 3.4 3.4 3.4
AGREE 2.0 78 19.1 19.2 22.7
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 133 32.6 32.8 55.4
NO OPINION 4.0 48 11.8 11.8 67.2
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 83 20.3 20.4 87.7
DISAGREE 6.0 39 9.6 9.6 97.3
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 11 2.7 2.7 100.0
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Give blacks preference for jobs, college (E9)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 11 2.7 2.7 2.7
AGREE 2.0 5 1.2 1.2 3.9
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 12 2.9 3.0 6.9
NO OPINION 4.0 10 2.5 2.5 9.4
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 34 8.3 8.4 17.7
DISAGREE 6.0 72 17.6 17.7 35.5
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 262 64.2 64.5 100.0
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Govt should act to narrow gap between rich and poor (E10)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 25 6.1 6.2 6.2
AGREE 2.0 32 7.8 7.9 14.0
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 78 19.1 19.2 33.3
NO OPINION 4.0 31 7.6 7.6 40.9
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 81 19.9 20.0 60.8
DISAGREE 6.0 75 18.4 18.5 79.3
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 84 20.6 20.7 100.0
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Govt set investment priorities (E11)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 4 1.0 1.0 1.0
AGREE 2.0 1 .2 .2 1.2
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 21 5.1 5.2 6.4
NO OPINION 4.0 63 15.4 15.6 22.0
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 85 20.8 21.0 43.1
DISAGREE 6.0 135 33.1 33.4 76.5
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 95 23.3 23.5 100.0
.0 4 1.0 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 404 Missing cases 4
Break up big corporations (E12)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 4 1.0 1.0 1.0
AGREE 2.0 7 1.7 1.7 2.7
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 15 3.7 3.7 6.4
NO OPINION 4.0 59 14.5 14.5 20.9
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 112 27.5 27.6 48.5
DISAGREE 6.0 122 29.9 30.0 78.6
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 87 21.3 21.4 100.0
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Subsidize exporters to save jobs (E13)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 7 1.7 1.7 1.7
AGREE 2.0 33 8.1 8.1 9.9
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 101 24.8 24.9 34.7
NO OPINION 4.0 91 22.3 22.4 57.1
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 78 19.1 19.2 76.4
DISAGREE 6.0 67 16.4 16.5 92.9
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 29 7.1 7.1 100.0
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Reduce us overseas investment (E14)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 14 3.4 3.4 3.4
AGREE 2.0 36 8.8 8.9 12.3
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 114 27.9 28.1 40.4
NO OPINION 4.0 62 15.2 15.3 55.7
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 84 20.6 20.7 76.4
DISAGREE 6.0 67 16.4 16.5 92.9
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 29 7.1 7.1 100.0
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Govt should take most of rich man's estate at death (E15)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 1 .2 .2 .2
AGREE 2.0 1 .2 .2 .5
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 3 .7 .7 1.2
NO OPINION 4.0 7 1.7 1.7 2.9
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 29 7.1 7.1 10.1
DISAGREE 6.0 120 29.4 29.5 39.6
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 246 60.3 60.4 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Abolish private schools (E16)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 5 1.2 1.2 1.2
AGREE 2.0 9 2.2 2.2 3.4
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 25 6.1 6.1 9.6
NO OPINION 4.0 12 2.9 2.9 12.5
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 80 19.6 19.7 32.2
DISAGREE 6.0 124 30.4 30.5 62.7
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 152 37.3 37.3 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Govt require preference for women in jobs, college admissions
(E17)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 8 2.0 2.0 2.0
AGREE 2.0 5 1.2 1.2 3.2
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 23 5.6 5.7 8.8
NO OPINION 4.0 10 2.5 2.5 11.3
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 55 13.5 13.5 24.8
DISAGREE 6.0 112 27.5 27.5 52.3
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 194 47.5 47.7 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Limit maximum incomes (E18)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 2 .5 .5 .5
AGREE 2.0 13 3.2 3.2 3.7
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 18 4.4 4.4 8.1
NO OPINION 4.0 10 2.5 2.5 10.6
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 35 8.6 8.6 19.2
DISAGREE 6.0 114 27.9 28.0 47.2
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 215 52.7 52.8 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Raise minimum wage high enough to support a family (E19)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 38 9.3 9.3 9.3
AGREE 2.0 54 13.2 13.3 22.6
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 79 19.4 19.4 42.0
NO OPINION 4.0 69 16.9 17.0 59.0
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 96 23.5 23.6 82.6
DISAGREE 6.0 43 10.5 10.6 93.1
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 28 6.9 6.9 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Govt should regulate rents (E20)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 8 2.0 2.0 2.0
AGREE 2.0 43 10.5 10.6 12.5
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 86 21.1 21.1 33.7
NO OPINION 4.0 36 8.8 8.8 42.5
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 106 26.0 26.0 68.6
DISAGREE 6.0 87 21.3 21.4 89.9
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 41 10.0 10.1 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Protect us business from foreign competition (E21)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 42 10.3 10.3 10.3
AGREE 2.0 81 19.9 19.9 30.2
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 111 27.2 27.3 57.5
NO OPINION 4.0 53 13.0 13.0 70.5
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 58 14.2 14.3 84.8
DISAGREE 6.0 38 9.3 9.3 94.1
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 24 5.9 5.9 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Govt should protect environment over property rights (E22)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 28 6.9 6.9 6.9
AGREE 2.0 53 13.0 13.0 19.9
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 103 25.2 25.3 45.2
NO OPINION 4.0 57 14.0 14.0 59.2
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 85 20.8 20.9 80.1
DISAGREE 6.0 56 13.7 13.8 93.9
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 25 6.1 6.1 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Limit amount of foreign investment in US (E23)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 9 2.2 2.2 2.2
AGREE 2.0 38 9.3 9.4 11.6
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 59 14.5 14.5 26.1
NO OPINION 4.0 79 19.4 19.5 45.6
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 86 21.1 21.2 66.7
DISAGREE 6.0 87 21.3 21.4 88.2
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 48 11.8 11.8 100.0
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Public housing a mistake (E24)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 19 4.7 4.7 4.7
AGREE 2.0 26 6.4 6.4 11.1
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 53 13.0 13.0 24.1
NO OPINION 4.0 69 16.9 17.0 41.0
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 119 29.2 29.2 70.3
DISAGREE 6.0 86 21.1 21.1 91.4
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 35 8.6 8.6 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Legalize euthanasia (P1)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 103 25.2 25.4 25.4
AGREE 2.0 116 28.4 28.6 54.1
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 69 16.9 17.0 71.1
NO OPINION 4.0 42 10.3 10.4 81.5
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 23 5.6 5.7 87.2
DISAGREE 6.0 23 5.6 5.7 92.8
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 29 7.1 7.2 100.0
.0 3 .7 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 405 Missing cases 3
Legalize homosexual sex (P2)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 99 24.3 24.3 24.3
AGREE 2.0 86 21.1 21.1 45.5
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 58 14.2 14.3 59.7
NO OPINION 4.0 43 10.5 10.6 70.3
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 24 5.9 5.9 76.2
DISAGREE 6.0 37 9.1 9.1 85.3
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 60 14.7 14.7 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Protect rights of accused (P3)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 14 3.4 3.4 3.4
AGREE 2.0 36 8.8 8.8 12.3
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 57 14.0 14.0 26.3
NO OPINION 4.0 30 7.4 7.4 33.7
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 104 25.5 25.6 59.2
DISAGREE 6.0 85 20.8 20.9 80.1
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 81 19.9 19.9 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Allow free speech for subversives (P4)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 49 12.0 12.0 12.0
AGREE 2.0 82 20.1 20.1 32.2
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 131 32.1 32.2 64.4
NO OPINION 4.0 25 6.1 6.1 70.5
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 43 10.5 10.6 81.1
DISAGREE 6.0 44 10.8 10.8 91.9
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 33 8.1 8.1 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Govt should recognize gay marriages (P5)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 41 10.0 10.1 10.1
AGREE 2.0 43 10.5 10.6 20.6
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 33 8.1 8.1 28.7
NO OPINION 4.0 43 10.5 10.6 39.3
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 52 12.7 12.8 52.1
DISAGREE 6.0 53 13.0 13.0 65.1
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 142 34.8 34.9 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Legalize marijuana (P6)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 62 15.2 15.3 15.3
AGREE 2.0 50 12.3 12.3 27.6
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 53 13.0 13.1 40.6
NO OPINION 4.0 35 8.6 8.6 49.3
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 36 8.8 8.9 58.1
DISAGREE 6.0 61 15.0 15.0 73.2
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 109 26.7 26.8 100.0
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Legalize gambling (P7)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 49 12.0 12.0 12.0
AGREE 2.0 82 20.1 20.1 32.2
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 96 23.5 23.6 55.8
NO OPINION 4.0 50 12.3 12.3 68.1
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 61 15.0 15.0 83.0
DISAGREE 6.0 45 11.0 11.1 94.1
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 24 5.9 5.9 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Legalize prostitution (P8)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 20 4.9 4.9 4.9
AGREE 2.0 31 7.6 7.6 12.5
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 31 7.6 7.6 20.1
NO OPINION 4.0 34 8.3 8.4 28.5
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 49 12.0 12.0 40.5
DISAGREE 6.0 90 22.1 22.1 62.7
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 152 37.3 37.3 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Abolish death penalty (P9)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 16 3.9 3.9 3.9
AGREE 2.0 8 2.0 2.0 5.9
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 20 4.9 4.9 10.8
NO OPINION 4.0 12 2.9 2.9 13.7
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 38 9.3 9.3 23.0
DISAGREE 6.0 106 26.0 26.0 49.0
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 208 51.0 51.0 100.0
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 408 Missing cases 0
Legalize sex outside marriage (P10)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 70 17.2 17.2 17.2
AGREE 2.0 66 16.2 16.2 33.3
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 41 10.0 10.0 43.4
NO OPINION 4.0 36 8.8 8.8 52.2
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 44 10.8 10.8 63.0
DISAGREE 6.0 58 14.2 14.2 77.2
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 93 22.8 22.8 100.0
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 408 Missing cases 0
Require one year universal youth service (P11)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 22 5.4 5.4 5.4
AGREE 2.0 26 6.4 6.4 11.8
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 65 15.9 15.9 27.7
NO OPINION 4.0 41 10.0 10.0 37.7
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 83 20.3 20.3 58.1
DISAGREE 6.0 93 22.8 22.8 80.9
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 78 19.1 19.1 100.0
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 408 Missing cases 0
Jail flag burners (P12)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 92 22.5 22.6 22.6
AGREE 2.0 87 21.3 21.4 44.0
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 77 18.9 18.9 62.9
NO OPINION 4.0 32 7.8 7.9 70.8
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 49 12.0 12.0 82.8
DISAGREE 6.0 37 9.1 9.1 91.9
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 33 8.1 8.1 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Make abortion more difficult to obtain (P13)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 84 20.6 20.7 20.7
AGREE 2.0 52 12.7 12.8 33.5
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 41 10.0 10.1 43.6
NO OPINION 4.0 50 12.3 12.3 55.9
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 40 9.8 9.9 65.8
DISAGREE 6.0 67 16.4 16.5 82.3
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 72 17.6 17.7 100.0
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Require school prayer as official business in public
schools (P14)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 74 18.1 18.2 18.2
AGREE 2.0 65 15.9 16.0 34.2
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 61 15.0 15.0 49.1
NO OPINION 4.0 55 13.5 13.5 62.7
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 46 11.3 11.3 74.0
DISAGREE 6.0 61 15.0 15.0 88.9
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 45 11.0 11.1 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Govt should censor for national security purposes (P15)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 30 7.4 7.4 7.4
AGREE 2.0 81 19.9 19.9 27.3
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 96 23.5 23.6 50.9
NO OPINION 4.0 30 7.4 7.4 58.2
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 55 13.5 13.5 71.7
DISAGREE 6.0 57 14.0 14.0 85.7
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 58 14.2 14.3 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Allow warrantless wiretaps to fight crime (P16)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 25 6.1 6.1 6.1
AGREE 2.0 42 10.3 10.3 16.5
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 52 12.7 12.8 29.2
NO OPINION 4.0 25 6.1 6.1 35.4
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 89 21.8 21.9 57.2
DISAGREE 6.0 103 25.2 25.3 82.6
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 71 17.4 17.4 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Require motorcycle helmets (P17)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 210 51.5 51.7 51.7
AGREE 2.0 99 24.3 24.4 76.1
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 42 10.3 10.3 86.5
NO OPINION 4.0 9 2.2 2.2 88.7
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 15 3.7 3.7 92.4
DISAGREE 6.0 19 4.7 4.7 97.0
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 12 2.9 3.0 100.0
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Ban black-white marriages by law (P18)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 36 8.8 8.8 8.8
AGREE 2.0 15 3.7 3.7 12.5
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 19 4.7 4.7 17.2
NO OPINION 4.0 43 10.5 10.6 27.8
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 50 12.3 12.3 40.0
DISAGREE 6.0 71 17.4 17.4 57.5
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 173 42.4 42.5 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Require compulsory drug testing for any one suspected (P19)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 65 15.9 16.0 16.0
AGREE 2.0 88 21.6 21.6 37.6
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 64 15.7 15.7 53.3
NO OPINION 4.0 33 8.1 8.1 61.4
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 50 12.3 12.3 73.7
DISAGREE 6.0 55 13.5 13.5 87.2
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 52 12.7 12.8 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Make easier for police to close porno theaters (P20)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 55 13.5 13.5 13.5
AGREE 2.0 56 13.7 13.7 27.2
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 68 16.7 16.7 43.9
NO OPINION 4.0 51 12.5 12.5 56.4
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 65 15.9 15.9 72.3
DISAGREE 6.0 72 17.6 17.6 90.0
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 41 10.0 10.0 100.0
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 408 Missing cases 0
Govt should ban tobacco by law in US (P21)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
AGREE STRONGLY 1.0 32 7.8 7.9 7.9
AGREE 2.0 27 6.6 6.6 14.5
TEND TO AGREE 3.0 42 10.3 10.3 24.8
NO OPINION 4.0 28 6.9 6.9 31.7
TEND TO DISAGREE 5.0 68 16.7 16.7 48.4
DISAGREE 6.0 97 23.8 23.8 72.2
DISAGREE STRONGLY 7.0 113 27.7 27.8 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Job & good living govt's responsibility? (I1)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
GOVT SEE TO IT 1.0 7 1.7 1.7 1.7
2.0 21 5.1 5.2 6.9
3.0 79 19.4 19.5 26.4
NEUTRAL 4.0 32 7.8 7.9 34.3
5.0 113 27.7 27.9 62.2
6.0 87 21.3 21.5 83.7
GET AHEAD ON OWN 7.0 66 16.2 16.3 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 405 Missing cases 3
Govt getting too powerful? (I2)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
GOVT TOO STRONG 1.0 187 45.8 46.1 46.1
GOVT NOT TOO STRONG 2.0 112 27.5 27.6 73.6
NO OPINION 3.0 107 26.2 26.4 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Should health insurance be govt's responsibility? (I3)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
GOVT INSURANCE PLAN 1.0 20 4.9 5.0 5.0
2.0 41 10.0 10.1 15.1
3.0 79 19.4 19.6 34.7
NEUTRAL 4.0 36 8.8 8.9 43.6
5.0 86 21.1 21.3 64.9
6.0 54 13.2 13.4 78.2
PRIVATE INSURANCE 7.0 88 21.6 21.8 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 3 .7 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 404 Missing cases 4
Should govt make taxes more progressive? (I4)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
HIGH INCOME PAY MUCH MORE 1.0 23 5.6 5.7 5.7
2.0 26 6.4 6.4 12.1
3.0 72 17.6 17.7 29.8
STAY SAME AS NOW 4.0 85 20.8 20.9 50.7
5.0 60 14.7 14.8 65.5
6.0 26 6.4 6.4 71.9
SAME TAX RATE FOR ALL 7.0 114 27.9 28.1 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
How much willing to cut govt services to cut taxes? (I5)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
MANY FEWER SERVICES 1.0 36 8.8 8.9 8.9
2.0 33 8.1 8.2 17.1
3.0 109 26.7 27.0 44.1
4.0 145 35.5 35.9 80.0
5.0 57 14.0 14.1 94.1
6.0 12 2.9 3.0 97.0
NO REDUCTION IN SERVICES 7.0 12 2.9 3.0 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 3 .7 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 404 Missing cases 4
Require daily school prayer? (I6)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
RELIGION NOT BELONG 1.0 119 29.2 29.4 29.4
NEUTRAL 2.0 88 21.6 21.7 51.1
START WITH PRAYER 3.0 198 48.5 48.9 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 405 Missing cases 3
Favor equal role for women in work and politics? (I7)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
EQUAL ROLE FOR SEXES 1.0 271 66.4 66.9 66.9
2.0 39 9.6 9.6 76.5
3.0 30 7.4 7.4 84.0
4.0 32 7.8 7.9 91.9
5.0 19 4.7 4.7 96.5
6.0 6 1.5 1.5 98.0
WOMEN'S PLACE AT HOME 7.0 8 2.0 2.0 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 405 Missing cases 3
When should the law permit woman to get abortion? (I8)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
ABORTION ALWAYS PERMISSABLE 1.0 121 29.7 29.9 29.9
UNABLE TO CARE FOR CHILD 2.0 99 24.3 24.4 54.3
LIFE AND HEALTH OF MOTHER 3.0 151 37.0 37.3 91.6
ABORTION NEVER PERMISSABLE 4.0 34 8.3 8.4 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 405 Missing cases 3
How much change criminal penalties for marijuana use? (I9)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
LEGALIZE MARIJUANA 1.0 86 21.1 21.2 21.2
2.0 40 9.8 9.9 31.1
3.0 51 12.5 12.6 43.7
PENALTIES AS NOW 4.0 69 16.9 17.0 60.7
5.0 39 9.6 9.6 70.4
6.0 35 8.6 8.6 79.0
HIGHER PENALTIES 7.0 85 20.8 21.0 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 405 Missing cases 3
How well trust govt to do right thing? (I10)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
ALMOST ALWAYS DO RIGHT 1.0 5 1.2 1.2 1.2
MOST OF TIME DO RIGHT 2.0 153 37.5 37.6 38.8
SOMETIMES DO RIGHT 3.0 227 55.6 55.8 94.6
NO OPINION 4.0 22 5.4 5.4 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Hard work or luck most important to get ahead? (I11)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
HARD WORK MOST IMPORTANT 1.0 224 54.9 55.3 55.3
WORK & LUCK EQUAL IMPORTANCE 2.0 176 43.1 43.5 98.8
LUCK MOST IMPORTANT 3.0 2 .5 .5 99.3
NO OPINION 4.0 3 .7 .7 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 405 Missing cases 3
Govt do more or do less? (I12)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DOES TOO MANY THINGS ALREADY 1.0 162 39.7 39.9 39.9
NOT SURE 2.0 169 41.4 41.6 81.5
GOVT SHOULD DO MORE 3.0 75 18.4 18.5 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Should govt promote traditional values? (I13)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
PROMOTE TRAD VALUES 1.0 108 26.5 26.7 26.7
VALUES NOT GOVT'S JOB 2.0 125 30.6 30.9 57.7
SOME OF BOTH 3.0 167 40.9 41.3 99.0
NOT SURE 4.0 4 1.0 1.0 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 3 .7 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 404 Missing cases 4
Income tax fair or unfair? (I14)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
SYSTEM BASICALLY FAIR 1.0 64 15.7 15.8 15.8
NEEDS MINOR ADJUSTMENTS 2.0 139 34.1 34.2 50.0
NEEDS MAJOR OVERHAUL 3.0 82 20.1 20.2 70.2
UNFAIR, SOLUTION UNCLEAR 4.0 52 12.7 12.8 83.0
NOT SURE WHETHER FAIR 5.0 69 16.9 17.0 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Appropriate maximum tax rate on $200,000 household income
(I15)
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
.0 1 .2 .3 .3
.5 1 .2 .3 .5
1.0 3 .7 .8 1.3
2.0 4 1.0 1.1 2.4
3.0 2 .5 .5 2.9
4.0 5 1.2 1.3 4.3
5.0 18 4.4 4.8 9.1
6.0 2 .5 .5 9.6
7.0 5 1.2 1.3 10.9
7.5 1 .2 .3 11.2
8.0 7 1.7 1.9 13.1
8.8 1 .2 .3 13.3
10.0 70 17.2 18.7 32.0
11.0 1 .2 .3 32.3
12.0 12 2.9 3.2 35.5
13.0 1 .2 .3 35.7
14.0 1 .2 .3 36.0
15.0 65 15.9 17.3 53.3
16.0 1 .2 .3 53.6
17.0 5 1.2 1.3 54.9
17.5 1 .2 .3 55.2
18.0 5 1.2 1.3 56.5
19.0 2 .5 .5 57.1
20.0 75 18.4 20.0 77.1
22.0 1 .2 .3 77.3
23.0 1 .2 .3 77.6
25.0 26 6.4 6.9 84.5
27.5 1 .2 .3 84.8
28.0 1 .2 .3 85.1
30.0 24 5.9 6.4 91.5
33.0 3 .7 .8 92.3
35.0 12 2.9 3.2 95.5
38.0 1 .2 .3 95.7
40.0 6 1.5 1.6 97.3
45.0 1 .2 .3 97.6
50.0 4 1.0 1.1 98.7
70.0 1 .2 .3 98.9
75.0 1 .2 .3 99.2
80.0 1 .2 .3 99.5
95.0 1 .2 .3 99.7
99.0 1 .2 .3 100.0
. 31 7.6 Missing
9.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 375 Missing cases 33
Ethnic background of respondent
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
WHITE 1.0 373 91.4 91.6 91.6
BLACK 2.0 23 5.6 5.7 97.3
LATIN AMERICAN 3.0 3 .7 .7 98.0
AMERINDIAN 4.0 1 .2 .2 98.3
ASIAN 5.0 2 .5 .5 98.8
OTHER 6.0 5 1.2 1.2 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Gender of respondent
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
MALE 1.0 217 53.2 53.3 53.3
FEMALE 2.0 190 46.6 46.7 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
State of residence of respondent
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
ALABAMA 1.0 256 62.7 62.7 62.7
OTHER SOUTHERN 2.0 126 30.9 30.9 93.6
NON-SOUTHERN STATE 3.0 26 6.4 6.4 100.0
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 408 Missing cases 0
Education level of head of family
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DIDN'T FINISH HIGH SCHOOL 1.0 4 1.0 1.0 1.0
HS GRAD 2.0 58 14.2 14.3 15.2
SOME COLLEGE 3.0 55 13.5 13.5 28.7
COLLEGE GRAD 4.0 153 37.5 37.6 66.3
ADV DEGREE 5.0 137 33.6 33.7 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
AU class standing
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
FRESHMAN 1.0 154 37.7 37.8 37.8
SOPHOMORE 2.0 174 42.6 42.8 80.6
JUNIOR 3.0 54 13.2 13.3 93.9
SENIOR 4.0 25 6.1 6.1 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Govt employee in household (including military, teachers)?
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
YES 1.0 179 43.9 44.0 44.0
NO 2.0 228 55.9 56.0 100.0
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1
Union member in household?
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
YES 1.0 32 7.8 7.9 7.9
NO 2.0 373 91.4 92.1 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 405 Missing cases 3
Religious background
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
CATHOLIC 1.0 61 15.0 15.0 15.0
PROTESTANT 2.0 261 64.0 64.3 79.3
NONE 4.0 25 6.1 6.2 85.5
OTHER 5.0 59 14.5 14.5 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Respondent's party preference
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
DEMOCRAT 1.0 65 15.9 16.0 16.0
REPUBLICAN 2.0 243 59.6 60.0 76.0
INDEPENDENT 3.0 94 23.0 23.2 99.3
OTHER 4.0 3 .7 .7 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 405 Missing cases 3
Ideological self-identification of respondent
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
CONSERVATIVE 1.0 176 43.1 43.3 43.3
LIBERAL 2.0 59 14.5 14.5 57.9
MIDDLE OF ROAD 3.0 117 28.7 28.8 86.7
DON'T KNOW 4.0 46 11.3 11.3 98.0
OTHER 5.0 8 2.0 2.0 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 1 .2 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 406 Missing cases 2
Registered to vote?
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
YES 1.0 337 82.6 83.2 83.2
NO 2.0 68 16.7 16.8 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 405 Missing cases 3
Vote for pres in 1996, Perot included
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
CLINTON 1.0 92 22.5 22.7 22.7
DOLE 2.0 242 59.3 59.8 82.5
PEROT 3.0 32 7.8 7.9 90.4
OTHER 3RD PARTY CAND 4.0 6 1.5 1.5 91.9
DUNNO, NOT VOTE 5.0 33 8.1 8.1 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 2 .5 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 405 Missing cases 3
Vote for pres in 1996, Perot out
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
CLINTON 1.0 98 24.0 24.8 24.8
DOLE 2.0 251 61.5 63.5 88.4
OTHER 3RD PARTY CAND 3.0 8 2.0 2.0 90.4
DUNNO, NOT VOTE 4.0 38 9.3 9.6 100.0
. 1 .2 Missing
.0 12 2.9 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 408 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 395 Missing cases 13
Averages of ECONFREE scores by levels of IDEOLOGY
(Ideological self-identification of respondent)
Variable Value Label Mean Std Dev Cases
For Entire Population 4.3972 .7663 392
IDEOLOGY 1.0 CONSERVATIVE 4.5929 .7893 169
IDEOLOGY 2.0 LIBERAL 4.1123 .7253 57
IDEOLOGY 3.0 MIDDLE OF ROAD 4.3143 .7028 115
IDEOLOGY 4.0 DON'T KNOW 4.0767 .5223 43
IDEOLOGY 5.0 OTHER 5.2063 .9386 8
Total Cases = 408
Missing Cases = 16 OR 3.9 PCT.
Averages of PERSFREE scores by levels of IDEOLOGY
(Ideological self-id of respondent)
Variable Value Label Mean Std Dev Cases
For Entire Population 3.9949 .9860 401
IDEOLOGY 1.0 CONSERVATIVE 3.4491 .8577 173
IDEOLOGY 2.0 LIBERAL 4.8603 .7822 58
IDEOLOGY 3.0 MIDDLE OF ROAD 4.2228 .7656 116
IDEOLOGY 4.0 DON'T KNOW 4.1967 .8771 46
IDEOLOGY 5.0 OTHER 5.0562 1.3914 8
Total Cases = 408
Missing Cases = 7 OR 1.7 PCT.
Averages of ECONFREE scores by levels of PARTY
(Respondent's party preference)
Variable Value Label Mean Std Dev Cases
For Entire Population 4.3972 .7663 392
PARTY 1.0 DEMOCRAT 3.9063 .5941 64
PARTY 2.0 REPUBLICAN 4.5111 .7544 234
PARTY 3.0 INDEPENDENT 4.4599 .7793 91
PARTY 4.0 OTHER 4.0833 .7006 3
Total Cases = 408
Missing Cases = 16 OR 3.9 PCT.
Averages of PERSFREE scores by levels of PARTY
(Respondent's party preference)
Variable Value Label Mean Std Dev Cases
For Entire Population 3.9944 .9872 400
PARTY 1.0 DEMOCRAT 4.5111 .8828 63
PARTY 2.0 REPUBLICAN 3.6558 .8269 240
PARTY 3.0 INDEPENDENT 4.4989 1.0725 94
PARTY 4.0 OTHER 4.4167 .8221 3
Total Cases = 408
Missing Cases = 8 OR 2.0 PCT.
Averages of ECONFREE scores by levels of PRESVOTE
(Vote for president in 1996, Perot included)
Variable Value Label Mean Std Dev Cases
For Entire Population 4.3968 .7672 391
PRESVOTE 1.0 CLINTON 4.0423 .6445 91
PRESVOTE 2.0 DOLE 4.5176 .7915 233
PRESVOTE 3.0 PEROT 4.5783 .7091 30
PRESVOTE 4.0 OTHR_3RD 4.5583 .7638 6
PRESVOTE 5.0 DUNNO_NO 4.3226 .6624 31
Total Cases = 408
Missing Cases = 17 OR 4.2 PCT.
Averages of PERSFREE scores by levels of PRESVOTE
(Vote for president in 1996, Perot included)
Variable Value Label Mean Std Dev Cases
For Entire Population 3.9980 .9853 400
PRESVOTE 1.0 CLINTON 4.5326 .8678 89
PRESVOTE 2.0 DOLE 3.6825 .8975 240
PRESVOTE 3.0 PEROT 4.3641 1.0028 32
PRESVOTE 4.0 OTHR_3RD 5.0667 1.1152 6
PRESVOTE 5.0 DUNNO_NO 4.3015 .9297 33
Total Cases = 408
Missing Cases = 8 OR 2.0 PCT.
U-102 students by degree of support for economic & personal
freedoms
++----+----+----+----+----+----+----+--+
E | CONSERVATIVES * * LIBERTARIANS |
C | * * | * * |
O 6+ * ***** **** +
N | ** ***|*+* ** * |
F | +* ******++++ * + * |
R | *++*+++ +* +++*+ + * |
E | + +++++++++++++ |
E 4+--------*-----++++++++++-+++----**----+
| *** * **+ ++++++++* + |
S | * * ++** ** * |
C | **| ** * * |
O | | * |
R 2+ | +
E |POPULISTS |LIBERALS |
S | | |
| | |
++----+----+----+----+----+----+----+--+
1 3 5 7
0 2 4 6
PERSFREE SCORES
388 cases plotted.