For this assignment, you must
write an essay of 1200-1500 words (5-6 pages), the purpose of which is to
persuade your reader of your interpretation of a popular culture icon of your
choosing. Your essay should
evaluate and interpret the icon by placing it within a larger, cultural context.
You may choose a person, a film hero, a toy, a character from a book, and
so on, but your choice must have cultural significance; in other words, whatever
person or object you choose must be one to which you can assign public
meaning and value.
You may choose from one of the following possible
strategies for approaching the assignment:
Select
as your audience for this essay a group of educated, informed readers who would
find your subject of interest. Do
this by identifying a particular publication and targeting
its readers. Aim for a
specific audience--readers of Spin,
Vanity Fair, Harpers, or
whatever seems appropriate.
This assignment may seem to
call for a new skill, but you are already an experienced evaluator and
interpreter of cultural texts. You
assign public meaning and value to a friend’s Linkin Park concert shirt, to a
Faith Hill album cover, to Calvin Klein’s newest ad, to the Harley that passes
you on I85, to your little brother’s Sponge Bob figure, and so on. The
difference in that kind of reading and the kind you must do for this essay is
that the latter requires you to move from casual conversation and/or internal
monologue to written discourse. But
by the time you write your essay, you will have read and/or discussed evaluative
interpretations of several icons. This
material will give you models for your own essay.
Remember that your essay must
persuade your readers that your interpretation is interesting and reasonable.
To meet these criteria, you must focus on public meaning rather than
functional or private meanings. This
assignment calls for careful, critical thinking and writing, but you should also
find it challenging, interesting--and even fun.
Grading
Criteria:
·
The introduction presents a compelling thesis that is clearly
defined and arguable.
·
All statements are supported by relevant evidence. Points are
supported by multiple pieces of evidence and indicate an overall understanding
of the subject.
·
All evidence is discussed in a compelling way in relation to the
thesis.. The discussion indicates a "lively mind at work."
·
The style is lively, relying on appropriate verb choice, specific
nouns and modifiers; the sentences vary appropriately in length and rhythm.
·
Word choice, transitions and the arrangement of information makes
for highly readable prose.
·
The essay is free of distracting errors in grammar, usage, and
mechanics.
Calendar:
|
Date |
Assignment |
In-class
activity |
|
Friday
11/7 |
World:
Sillars 169-171; Pitts 313-15. |
Invention
Exercise |
|
Monday
11/10 |
World:
Yolen 452-458 |
Topic
Proposal |
|
Wednesday
11/12 |
Draft
4.1 due. |
Group
Response |
|
Friday
11/14 |
Draft
4.2 due. |
Peer
Reviews |
|
Monday
11/17 |
Individual
Conferences |
No
class meeting |
|
Wednesday
11/19 |
Individual
Conferences |
No
class meeting |
|
Friday
11/21 |
Working
copy of revised draft due. |
Revision
workshop—focus on sentence construction. |
|
Monday
12/1 |
Revision
due. |
Editing
Workshop. |
|
Wednesday
12/3 |
Writing
Project 4 due. |
Begin
progressive final examination. |